Settings and activity
74 results found
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment 
Whisperer
commented
Item 1 is a good idea.
Item 2 is addressed in the PLS suggestion (https://planets.uservoice.com/forums/136520-general/suggestions/5579406-implement-the-proposed-nu-pls-planets-limit-shi).
-
29 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
> A new player hasn't demonstrated that they have any tenacity so perhaps they should start on 0, and then earn it as they go
That would greatly restrict a new player for at least 2 years, and have an impact for almost three years, which would probably drive many new players away. My goal was to have a minimum impact on a new player, so that new player retention isn't effected, but to keep players who haven't finished games out of the games that require more dedication, until the new player has demonstrated that they have that dedication.
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
Just to clarify a point made in the thread. This is not a punishment. This is changing Tenacity from an entitlement (something it should never have been) to something that's earned (what it should have been from the beginning).
The described implementation will have no impact on a new player, and a slight impact on the advancement of a second player.
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
Discussion thread for this suggestion - http://planets.nu/#/activity/2749215
Whisperer
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
I took another look. This game had a DM of 1.24, so it doesn't qualify for the "The Ships Are Mine" badge.
The only time that a DM 1.24 game will give this badge is for a game with a minimum rank of Captain, where all the players are at that rank.
This is not a bug.
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
The game charts show that by turn 20 you had met all the qualifications for the "The Ships Are Mine" badge, and you should have received it. Based on the comments I've seen from other players in the feed, I believe that this is a rarely encountered bug.
I would like to suggest that you use the CONTACT button at the bottom of the most of the Planets.nu pages.
Congratulations on the 13 Badges (totaling 225 achievement points) you've received in this game, your first as a Robot.
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
Each starship is allowed only one Foreign Cargo Transfer per turn. If you select a second Foreign target and initiate a transfer, the first is cleared.
I believe this is by design.
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
If I understand this request correctly, it's already in there.
When I perform ship/ship or ship/planet and I control both the source and destination, the transfer happens. When I don't control the recipient, and I go back to do another transfer to that recipient, I can see what the pending transfer request is.
Is this the feature you were looking for?
-
3 votesWhisperer
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
This is an EXCELLENT suggestion. I'd vote for it if I had any votes available.
It would also be useful to see the crew status.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
I just tried this in a training game and it worked properly
This problem appears to have been resolved sometime in the past 5 years.
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
New suggestion https://planets.uservoice.com/forums/136520-general/suggestions/18388963-ship-notes-persistent-after-id-re-use duplicated this suggestion.
> just erase the comment when the new ship is born
That's easy enough to do when the ship is yours, but how about if the original ship belonged to an enemy, and the new one does as well? You could see a new ship with an old message, that may, or may not, apply.
Fixing this bug is trivial. It should be done to reduce confusion.
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
This is a long-standing bug.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
-
53 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
> Makes sense, as long as the winners get the bonus multiplier for victory.
Joshua has ended a few games at the request of the players. As no player or alliance had met the Win Conditions, no player or alliance received a Victory bonus.
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
-
32 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
A third-party no-cost subscription service has been implemented to notify the game Host of changes to the player list of their game.
http://planets.nu/discussion/i-would-like-to-announce-the-availability-of-a-service-to
If there is enough demand, I could probably expand that to allow users to subscribe to the service, to see player changes in the games they're in.
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
Being ejected from a game should have no impact on the player's Tenacity.
Also, if a player is ejected from a game, it might be a good idea for it to not show up on the player's public game history.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
Currently, the system doesn't have the time-zone of the players.
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
The current version of the Training games doesn't give any Achievement Points, so no promotion occurs.
-
49 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
If the players decide to end a game early, all they need to do is transfer enough planets to the "winner" to allow them to meet the win conditions. This has been done in games previously and it works.
If a game ends without meeting the win conditions, then the "winner" hasn't earned the bonus.
-
16 votesWhisperer
shared this idea
·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
The claim is that the change is needed, but nothing that clearly states WHY this change is needed, what purpose it serves or how it benefits Planets.nu as a whole.
-
82 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
This shouldn't be all that large of a change. A message is currently being sent out when a turn Hosts. It's just adding a bit more data to the message.
It would also be nice if this were a player option (default = on).
> or an sms teaser
This would require that Planets.nu have your phone number, which they don't currently have. It would be much more complex than just adding information to an email message that's already being sent out.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
This also frequently allows low-rank players to push a game with a high-rank requirement into the Joining state. This causes the game to take longer to actually fill.
Whisperer
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
This request dates from 2011. I believe it has been fixed with the ability to create custom games. If a player wants a team game, they can create it.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Whisperer
commented
As of about a year ago, Destruction Points are no longer part of either the Achievement Points or Campaign Resources system. Because of this, granting Destruction Points is a meaningless action.
Item 1 is also addressed in the Non-Premium Player suggestion (https://planets.uservoice.com/forums/136520-general/suggestions/2318417-make-some-games-for-non-premium-players-only).