Settings and activity
9 results found
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
olegboleg
commented
i disagree for two reasons.
the idea of the game is not for everyone to have a super storng ship and fight. For the privateers the tactic is to steal strong ships and fight with those.
secondly: you can do this if you like. win the championship game as a privateer and design a strong fighting ship. (i would still not like it, but that would be a way to do it)
-
109 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment olegboleg
commented
we got badges now, removing my vote
An error occurred while saving the comment olegboleg
commented
i think badges are a nice idea. everyone loves to get a star. :)
i dont know about the ladder system though.
-
77 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment olegboleg
commented
Can aynone explain to me the advantage of this?
At first glance i dont see why this is suggested and i see a big problem right away: Every race is different. there are some races that will build less but more powerful ships and those that need dozens of small ships.
For example a Privateer will need much more ships then lets say a Robot of equal size.
-
122 votesolegboleg
supported this idea
·
-
86 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment olegboleg
commented
i strongly disagree with this.
i assume its mostly very new players that will support this and i understand the "frustration" that may overcome you at first when you learn and learn and there is always something you did not think about or did not know. and Battle Orders are very very complex. But what you are suggesting makes this game into a very very different one.
the game is not about realism.let me draw you an analogy:
Chess is not realistic. You do not just go ahead and just change the chess rules so that you can move all your tiles at once because its more realistic, do you? you can make such a game and maybe its good, buts its not chess.i think there a re many aspects of this game that could be changed and it would be an interesting thing. And thats why there were AddOns and now there are game Options like stellar cartography.
But this is to much of a change to still call it the same game.
-
139 votesolegboleg
supported this idea
·
-
120 votesolegboleg
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment olegboleg
commented
i second this motion.
The community at planets.nu is great. its helpful and eloquent. there is hardly ever any "flaming" and questions are answered quick, good and complete. (no read the manual! or such stuff)
right now i find it only hard to communicate effectively with other players in game or outside. the feed is nice IMHO, but its not very helpful for a private communication. I evade to mail, ICQ and IRC.
therefor a light messaging system with private and or group chats would be nice.
-
57 votesolegboleg
supported this idea
·
Hi groof,
realism is nice but not always needed in a game. Take chess for example. Imagine someone would say: well yes, thats a nice game but the pawns should have guns and be able to shoot. Lets change the whole rules of chess.
you wouldnt do that, would you? make a new game if you like, but changing an exisiting game so fundemantally is not a good idea.