Settings and activity
13 results found
-
49 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment emork supported this idea · -
41 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment emork commentedOr make it a setting.
emork supported this idea · -
5 votesemork supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment emork commentedMeanwhile yy sector rescue value dropped down to 100% despite recently finishing several replacement games at an improved position. Prior to this comment I discussed it in the forum and I had a look at the history of player’s with better sector rescue value but I don’t find an explanation. It is quite frustrating to finish a replacement game at improved position and receive a tenacity malus therefore.
An error occurred while saving the comment emork commentedNow I finished another replacement game at an improved position and again my sector rescue value dropped by 2.5. Seems the sectors don't appreciate being rescued. This gets frustrating. Please fix it or explain where I (and all others) fail in understanding the rules. Maybe sector resuce value is based on running games and not finished ones? Then the tenacity guide on the planets-mag has to be corrected.
emork shared this idea · -
57 votesemork supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment emork commentedIt would make the leaderboard much more meaningful if just these pool games + hand selected games or game series (Die Hard) count towards the leaderboard.
-
69 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment emork commentedI want to add that in teamgames I make limited turns for my teammate if he has a problem or makes holidays where he can't play. I don't think this violates the spirit of the relevant site rule because I don't get any otherwise unavaillable information by doing this. (If I'm wrong I'd ask for an official statement because I know that many do so. I'd certainly adjust my behaviour then.)
I also did a holiday replacement for a player which I didn't know up to then. But he wrote a good user script and I wanted to do a favour in return. Of course I wasn't involved in this game with my own account.
I tell it here because IP tracking could hit me in these cases.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment emork commentedThat's a good additonal hint, Finn. Thx!
emork shared this idea · -
0 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment emork commentedYou can close that. Probably was caused by an user script.
emork shared this idea · -
139 votes
-
29 votes
-
0 votesemork shared this idea ·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment emork commentedI forgot: Windows 7, Firefox 16.0.2
emork shared this idea · -
8 votesemork supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
I voted for this because it makes players more happy to end a game by vote than by drop if they don't want to go on. But I strongly suggest that _all_ players have to agree. It's a war and not a democracy simulatiopn. And of course such a game shouldn't give achievement points to prevent exploits and a distortion of the leaderboard. Ok, maybe 1 point per planet for all as acknoledgement of their effort would be ok if 100+ turns were played.